Im sure this has been covered before but im still gonna ask again!
when you say (dwardo) that it should be forearm thick - i assume you mean the split stave - not the tree...?
So you need about a 6" x section or tree to get that right?
Also is it me or is a knot and branch free 8ft like rocking horse £*@$ or am i not looking hard enough. While im here can branches be used or does it need to be the trunk?
thank you
!
Yes they are like rocking horse ****
but its half the fun looking
There tends to be less knots and pins etc in the trunks but branches can be used. I have used branches in the past mainly from yew which is only due to the fact that i cant find anyone that will let me cut down their 500 year old yew trunk
and i cant afford a real stave.
I find the easiest wood to get hold of is either ash, elm, hazel or even goat willow at a push. These i have found the most forgiving of our local white woods.
I would say that any trunk/branch over about 3 across inch will do for starters. The problem with smaller diameter branches and trunks is that due to their small circular cross section its hard to get relatively flat back to your bow.
You tend to use the untouched wood right under the bark for the back of the bow which by definition of a small diameter sapling is more "rounded". This is called "crown" meaning that if the back is rounded as opposed to flat it can cause more pressure on the belly causing it to collapse or crystal. On the other end of the scale its a pain in the "£$"£$"£ to handle much bigger timber as you need chainsaws, people who arent petrified of chainsaws(me), hours of splitting and transporting etc.
I will be happy to answer any other questions you or anyone else has but please remember its only my opinion and i have only been bow making for the past 3 years or so.