Quite possibly. For the avoidance of doubt, if the bloke did discharge his weapon into the night, he was bloody stupid and deserved to have his certificate revoked.
Out of interest why do you think the CPS were "keen to prosecute"? I have seen nothing on that in any of the papers. Indeed in your post above #31 you say you were mistaken in thinking the landowner was charged. Then you say
I would hope the CPS aren't "keen" to do anything. I would hope they objectively examine the evidence and proceed if a conviction is likely.
This case in general has a lot of unanswered questions and I suspect we may never know the whole story. I find it insightful though that people are more interested in the handicapped elderly landowner than the cache of drugs and firearms with a hole in the wall with two people there for no clear reason.
Out of interest why do you think the CPS were "keen to prosecute"? I have seen nothing on that in any of the papers. Indeed in your post above #31 you say you were mistaken in thinking the landowner was charged. Then you say
CPS were clearly keen to prosecute and they do not bring an attempted murder charge lightly.
I would hope the CPS aren't "keen" to do anything. I would hope they objectively examine the evidence and proceed if a conviction is likely.
This case in general has a lot of unanswered questions and I suspect we may never know the whole story. I find it insightful though that people are more interested in the handicapped elderly landowner than the cache of drugs and firearms with a hole in the wall with two people there for no clear reason.