|
Written by Mark Aspell
|
|
The rucksack is designed to be worn over military belt pouches, which means it rides high on the back. The belt is in actually fact a waist belt rather than a hip belt and fits around the waist.
|
|
|
Written by Mark Aspell
|
|
Thankfully we didn’t need to test this theory! The dry bag sat nicely in the bottom of the rucksacks and, as there are no valves or anything complicated to remember...
|
|
|
Written by John Fenna
|
The main body of the Vintage 20, the lid and side pockets are made from Fjallraven’s famous impregnated 65/35% polycotton G1000
|
|
|
Written by Tony Bristow
|
|

Sabre 45 is probably the rucksack that others are marked against in the bushcraft market. I was very interested to see what all the hype was about and if the real thing lived up to it all! |
|
|
Written by Mikey P
|
I was intrigued by Spamel’s thread on the Snugpak Response Pak – or their other types of ‘grab-n-go’ bags - and what people carried in them. I’m a bit of a bag junkie, partly because of my work (military) and partly because of a quest to be able to carry the right equipment for the right job in practically any situation. I guess the ‘Holy Grail’ is effectively a bag that you instinctively grab, without thinking about it, before you go off for an adventure.
|
|
|
Written by Chris Claycombe
|
My first impression of the Sabre 60-100 pack was that it was one really sturdy pack, and how really heavy it was when empty!
|
|
|
Written by Darren Phillips
|
|
A big sophisticated rucksack firmly in the expedition sack class. Its basic form gives 75 litres of capacity, with the possible addition of the extra 24 litres of twin “Rocket Pack” side pouches...
|
|
|