Alpkit
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 62

Thread: conversions

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    5,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by santaman2000 View Post
    LOL. So you're going to stop at ther pub later for a 1/2 liter?
    i think you will find it's .57 of a litre, half a litre is .8 of a pint

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    East Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepis View Post
    i think you will find it's .57 of a litre, half a litre is .8 of a pint
    I think you'll find on the Continent, beer is served in 250ml and 500ml volumes...

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    5,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spandit View Post
    I think you'll find on the Continent, beer is served in 250ml and 500ml volumes...
    I know, ive spent more than my fair share of time out in Europe, but over here we go to the Pub for a pint which is .57L not 500ml

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    East Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepis View Post
    I know, ive spent more than my fair share of time out in Europe, but over here we go to the Pub for a pint which is .57L not 500ml
    Actually .568l but perhaps you have a generous landlord!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    5,020

    Default

    Dunno, dont drink in pubs, too expensive, about the only place i do have bevvie is around the fire with you guys these days, so i'll bring some measuring jugs next time out and see if you lot serve up short measures

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    East Sussex, UK
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    You were sorely missed at the last meet. We did actually do some bushcraft (I did some forging, ropework & carving). I tend to bring sloe gin & I'd be impressed if you could drink a pint of that (or even 500ml)!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    5,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spandit View Post
    You were sorely missed at the last meet. We did actually do some bushcraft (I did some forging, ropework & carving). I tend to bring sloe gin & I'd be impressed if you could drink a pint of that (or even 500ml)!
    I would have rather been at Ashdown with you guys than at the show i did, was a bit slow, still i came out of it with a few more pennies than i went in with, so not all bad.

    I'll swap you some of my Blackberry Gin for your Sloe at the June meet which is the next one im at, and we can compare the alcohol content

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    near Oxford and Pyrenees-Oriental, France
    Posts
    568

    Default

    I qualified as a teacher in 1969. My first boss said, "Don't teach any thing other than metric measurements and decimal money, because by the time these children grow up all other units will be past history." My first pupils will now be in their fifties and here we are still converting. What a waste of time and effort. By the way, mine's a pint!
    The older I get, the better I was.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    716

    Default

    Double it.
    Add 32.
    Minus one tenth of the doubled number.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepis View Post
    i think you will find it's .57 of a litre, half a litre is .8 of a pint
    That's kinda my point.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    -------------
    Posts
    2,865

    Default

    The Metre is dead easy to remember cos its equal to 1,650,793.73 wavelengths of the orange-red emission line in the electromagnetic spectrum of the krypton-86 atom in a vacuum

    Dead easy, ahem.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    52

    Default

    And Celsius, being a centigrade system, is by definition a "decimal" (divisible by ten) system.

    Everyone thinks we use decimal measure, but that's not true. What we use is SI units. There are seven basic units (Kg, metre, second, Ampere, Kelvin, Candela and Mole) from which all other units are derived. (For example the unit of speed is metres per second) SI just happen to be based on the convenience of a base ten system.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScoobySnacks View Post
    And Celsius, being a centigrade system, is by definition a "decimal" (divisible by ten) system.

    Everyone thinks we use decimal measure, but that's not true. What we use is SI units. There are seven basic units (Kg,...
    Actually the basic unit there is the gram, not the Kg. The Kg (a 1000 multiple of the basic gram) is more useful for larger items simply because the basic gram is just too small and the numbers would be too large. Just as when measuring still larger items we switch to the Mg (Megagram, or 1 million grams) more commonly known as a metric ton.

    None-the-less they are all derived from the basic gram.
    Last edited by santaman2000; 22-05-2012 at 01:03.

  14. #44

    Default

    when people who uses the imperial system says ton, do they mean 1000kg?

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by santaman2000 View Post
    Actually the basic unit there is the gram, not the Kg. The Kg (a 1000 multiple of the basic gram) is more useful for larger items simply because the basic gram is just too small and the numbers would be too large. Just as when measuring still larger items we switch to the Mg (Megagram, or 1 million grams) more commonly known as a metric ton.

    None-the-less they are all derived from the basic gram.
    Pedantically it isn't, it's just named that way. The Kilogram is defined as the mass of a lump of stuff held somewhere somewhere in France (I may have paraphrased ). The Gram is defined as 1/1000th of a Kilogram so is in fact derived from the gram.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffen View Post
    when people who uses the imperial system says ton, do they mean 1000kg?
    They probably mean 1016Kg, 1000Kg is a tonne
    Last edited by Graveworm; 22-05-2012 at 06:56.

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cranborne Chase Dorset
    Posts
    3,382

    Default

    So navigation

    Degrees or Mils ???

    and explain to me why its actually technically more accurate to use degrees when using a basic hand held compass

    ATB

    Duncan

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cranborne Chase Dorset
    Posts
    3,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffen View Post
    when people who uses the imperial system says ton, do they mean 1000kg?

    or 14593 slugs

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffen View Post
    when people who uses the imperial system says ton, do they mean 1000kg?
    No. They mean 2,240 lbs or 20cwt (1cwt=112lb). Twenty hundredweight is a ton.

    The metric tonne is distinguished from the Imperial one by the spelling.

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffen View Post
    when people who uses the imperial system says ton, do they mean 1000kg?
    Quote Originally Posted by FGYT View Post
    or 14593 slugs
    No, a slug is a mass of around 14.6kg so 1000/14.6 is about 68.5 slugs.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_%28mass%29

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FGYT View Post
    So navigation

    Degrees or Mils ???

    and explain to me why its actually technically more accurate to use degrees when using a basic hand held compass
    It makes no difference to accuracy which system you use. Trivial rounding errors aside, the accuracy depends on the ability accurately to read the displayed measurement, not on the units of the display.

  21. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by santaman2000 View Post
    Actually the basic unit there is the gram, not the Kg. The Kg (a 1000 multiple of the basic gram) is more useful for larger items simply because the basic gram is just too small and the numbers would be too large. Just as when measuring still larger items we switch to the Mg (Megagram, or 1 million grams) more commonly known as a metric ton.

    None-the-less they are all derived from the basic gram.
    No, the fundamental unit in the MKS (SI) system is the kilogram.

    http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SI.html

    The gram was used in the old CGS system, no longer considered useful. The unit of force in the CGS system is the dyne, in the MKS system it is the Newton.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyne

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_%28unit%29

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cranborne Chase Dorset
    Posts
    3,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ged View Post
    It makes no difference to accuracy which system you use. Trivial rounding errors aside, the accuracy depends on the ability accurately to read the displayed measurement, not on the units of the display.

    yes its a theoretical question to counter the usual " there's 6400 mills in a circle and only 360 degrees .......... mils is obviously more accurate " brain wash you get out of some military biased views

    the answer should lay in the "basic hand held compass" I specified in the question and your "the accuracy depends on the ability accurately to read the displayed measurement" when applied to that item


    ATB

    Duncan

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ged View Post
    No, the fundamental unit in the MKS (SI) system is the kilogram.

    http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SI.html

    The gram was used in the old CGS system, no longer considered useful. The unit of force in the CGS system is the dyne, in the MKS system it is the Newton.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyne

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_(unit)
    I understand "metric." the differentiations between "MKS (SI)" and "CGS" aren't anything I'm remotely familiar with; or even aware of for that matter.

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ged View Post
    No. They mean 2,240 lbs or 20cwt (1cwt=112lb). Twenty hundredweight is a ton.

    The metric tonne is distinguished from the Imperial one by the spelling.
    Not sure about the official defintions but over here, yes, when people say a "ton" it does mean 1000Kg (2200 pounds) if they're working in metric (usually they'll phrase it either as a "metric ton" or a "long ton") A standard Imperial ton over here is still 2000 pounds while a "short ton" (used to weigh precious metals) is only 1600 pounds.

    The different spelling (ton vs tonne) over here is usually just attributed to cultural differences (American vs European) rather than used to differentiate between measuring systems.
    Last edited by santaman2000; 22-05-2012 at 14:27.

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    near Oxford and Pyrenees-Oriental, France
    Posts
    568

    Default

    I studied Art and Education not Science, but I thought the metric system a by-product of the French Revolution and was based upon length and a subdivision of the earth's circumference: the basic unit being a metre. A 1000 cubic centimetres was the volume of a litre, and the weight of a litre of water was a kilogramme and so on. I know from carrying enough of it that a litre of water weighs a kilo.
    In case anyone is listening, mine's still a pint!
    The older I get, the better I was.

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by santaman2000 View Post
    I understand "metric." the differentiations between "MKS (SI)" and "CGS" aren't anything I'm remotely familiar with; or even aware of for that matter.
    There's method in all this:

    The force required to accelerate one slug at 1 ft/s/s is one pound(f). Imperial system, sometimes called fps, and unsatisfactory because it has two units called the pound and they're different.

    The force required to accelerate one gram at 1 cm/s/s is one dyne. Centimetre/gram/second system, or CGS, non-standardized and so unsatisfactory when it comes to electrical measurements.

    The force required to accelerate one kilogram at 1 m/s/s is one Newton. Metre/kilogram/second system, or MKS. Finally, they got this one right.

    Anyway, if you can get a grip on that you're well on the way to becoming a rocket scientist.

    http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/cgsfps.htm

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ged View Post
    There's method in all this:

    The force required to accelerate one slug at 1 ft/s/s is one pound(f). Imperial system, sometimes called fps, and unsatisfactory because it has two units called the pound and they're different.

    The force required to accelerate one gram at 1 cm/s/s is one dyne. Centimetre/gram/second system, or CGS, non-standardized and so unsatisfactory when it comes to electrical measurements.

    The force required to accelerate one kilogram at 1 m/s/s is one Newton. Metre/kilogram/second system, or MKS. Finally, they got this one right.

    Anyway, if you can get a grip on that you're well on the way to becoming a rocket scientist.

    http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/cgsfps.htm
    Oddly, my first 2 years at university (1974-1976) were spent studying for a Bachelor's degree in engineering (I began as a civil engineering major but later leaned towards aeronautical engineering) My final Bachelor's degree was/is in Proffessional Aeronautics with a minor in Aviation Safety (finally awarded in 1994 after several interuptions for military service and only studying part time after duty hours)
    Last edited by santaman2000; 22-05-2012 at 15:39.

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldtimer View Post
    I studied Art and Education not Science, but I thought the metric system a by-product of the French Revolution and was based upon length and a subdivision of the earth's circumference: the basic unit being a metre. A 1000 cubic centimetres was the volume of a litre, and the weight of a litre of water was a kilogramme and so on...
    You're mostly right about the origins. Except it's not a product of the French Revolution; it predates that. The French Revolution wasn't until 1789; The first US Congress debated using the metric system in 1787 (2 years earlier) but decided against it because GB was stil our main trading partner and it was still using Imperial. Although for some reason Wikki still shows it to have been introduced by france in 1799?
    Last edited by santaman2000; 22-05-2012 at 20:38.

  29. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Prague CZ, but hail from Devon
    Posts
    212

    Default

    To convert to C from F I type "50F in C" into google and the answer appears.
    Quote Originally Posted by spandit View Post
    I think you'll find on the Continent, beer is served in 250ml and 500ml volumes...
    In CZ a small beer is usually 300ml and a large 500ml, I guess 250ml just isn't enough for the Czechs

  30. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldtimer View Post
    the weight of a litre of water was a kilogramme and so on.!
    It's mass is almost exactly a kilogram but annoyingly not exactly. It's weight depends on many things but is not measured in Kilos On earth it would weigh about 9.8 Newtons

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •