Alpkit
Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Jungle boots question.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Here and there
    Posts
    395

    Default Jungle boots question.

    I'm thinking of getting a pair of jungle boots for ordinary hiking. I like the idea as they are, from my understanding at least, light, quick to dry, and have a tread which is good in muddy conditions.
    The questions I have, though, are:

    What is the panama sole like on grass, dry terrain, and rocky terrain?

    Is the goretex reversed (I read somewhere that in jungle conditions, due to humidity, goretex needs to be the opposite way around to work - don't know if this is right or not, though).

    Does the goretex upper provide enough ankle support?

    Would the goretex version be waterproof in bad conditioned if the two drain points in the side were blocked with seam sealent (See goretex question above)?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    SCOTLAND
    Posts
    2,848

    Default

    They are not goretex buddy!
    Not all those who wander are lost !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Nope. The originals were canvas; now they're balistic nylon. Definitely NOT Goretex. And definitely not waterproof. As for whether they have enough ankle support; well they were worn by paratroopers (not designed as jump boots but they were popular as such) I've jumped in them (sport jump)
    Last edited by santaman2000; 17-04-2012 at 22:14.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    your house!
    Posts
    10,938

    Default

    IMO

    fine on all surfaces though its a solid heel and the boot is best with out socks,

    as above, its not gortex its a canvas type stuff, not water proof at all by design, it lets water in and out easily so you don't get foot rot(hopefully)

    as above its not gotex, but its supportive enough again IMO

    Its still not gortex

    hope this helps

  5. #5

    Default

    There are better lightweight boots out there, i do miss my jungles. The altberg sneekers are better and even come in a aqua version.

  6. #6

    Default

    I really don't know, I don't see what is wrong with sandals myself ( Merrel, Keen, Teva etc.) if you are going for the ultimate in lightweight. It is like the original US Jungle boots vs Ho Chi Minh Sandals (the type made from car tyres) I don't suppose one was better than the other, it was more to do with attitude.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hamilton NZ
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Jungle boots are designed to get saturated and let water out of the boot as fast as possible ( for a boot) they make no pretence at being waterproof. If you wear them in temperate climes in wet conditions your feet will get wet. Fine if you dont mind that happening...

    I personally don't mind getting wet feet it's part of the deal tramping here in NZ with frequent stream and river crossings when out tramping. so I've given up on waterproof boots for most bush stuff these days and gone for a breathable fast drying boot with no goretex etc.







    Given there are a heap of desert type boots floating around currently I am using both the LOWA Desert Elite and also a civilianised version of the Meindl Desert Fox both boots have been fine both are wearing well, dry quickly and drain water fast. The Meindls are probably a bit lighter... The LOWA's seem more suited to rock and scree etc...

    That might be a suggestion but TBH neither drain as quickly as a true jungle boot.
    Ka tū te ihiihi
    Ka tū te wanawana
    Ki runga ki te rangi e tū iho nei, tū iho nei, hī!

  8. #8

    Default

    If you want jungle boots make sure you get the Milspec ones - ideally direct from Altama or another manufacturer. The Milspec ones have a leather insole - take the footbed out and check. The cheaper ones have a synthetic insole and are not as tough.
    I was mis-sold a pair - alledging they were milspec by a well known UK army surplus place in London - and the shank in one of the boots crapped out after a month of fairly hardcore trekking in Borneo. Altama sell milspec AND vulcanized jungle boots which are way cheaper.
    The panama sole is REALLY good for grip on jungle roots and in the environments I have been in, better than the Vibram sole that I had on a pair of Altberg jungles. The Altamas are $115 - and the Altbergs are probably £115 - no contest even with shipping and if you had to pay duty too. I think the Altamas are a better lighter boot, but the Altbergs would be better for the NZ bush stuff that Johnboy mentions.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    3,745

    Default

    Jungle boots are for the jungle.
    "Mummy, when I grow up I want to be a bushcrafter."
    "You can't do both son."

  10. #10

    Default

    jungle boots are ace, but as above, not waterproof, they are meant to drain quickly and perform very well at this, i've had countless pairs of jungles and deserts made by altama and belleville. they are superb, mold to your foot size very well, ive had regular and medium fit and both have been comfortable. old ones are canvas and leather, new ones are nylon and leather, better versions have a padded cuff.
    the sole is designed for jungles, and ive found that its the sole that wears out first and have binned many a pair due to this. the americans found this when they deployed to gulf war 1 with the desert version, it is the same boot but in suede and without the water vents. they have a thin lining too. the soles wore thru very quickly, and is why they developed harder wearing boots for further desert conflicts.

    i miss my boots, but, i wouldn't use them for UK hiking, having said that, John Geddes wrote a book called 'spearhead assault' about his falklands war experiences in a patrols, and he wore jungle boots in that conflict, and as we know the weather was terrible, arctic winds, muddy wet moorland and mountain terrain, and he states that the boots drainage properties meant he was one of the few who didn't suffer trench foot. he did however, not mind getting cold and wet feet!
    personally, i can do without a shallow stream in freezing conditions soaking my feet at the start of an outing. but.....they don't have all the padding to soak and make them heavy.


    swings...and...roundabouts!

    they do become like hi-leg slippers for the outdoors mind, and summer woodland use they are fine. oh and jungles...deffo think they are suitable for jungles. something in the name.
    Last edited by Rabbitsmacker; 18-04-2012 at 09:48. Reason: missed a bit
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  11. #11

    Default

    i've also heard they can smell? never have i ever had either desert or jungle boots smell even after prolonged hot weather use. they always smell of leather and nothing else. grrr, i feel like my wallets going to groan about this reminicing!
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  12. #12

    Default

    johnboy, those meindls look the mutts nuts, do you know what model they are?
    Quote Originally Posted by johnboy View Post
    Jungle boots are designed to get saturated and let water out of the boot as fast as possible ( for a boot) they make no pretence at being waterproof. If you wear them in temperate climes in wet conditions your feet will get wet. Fine if you dont mind that happening...

    I personally don't mind getting wet feet it's part of the deal tramping here in NZ with frequent stream and river crossings when out tramping. so I've given up on waterproof boots for most bush stuff these days and gone for a breathable fast drying boot with no goretex etc.







    Given there are a heap of desert type boots floating around currently I am using both the LOWA Desert Elite and also a civilianised version of the Meindl Desert Fox both boots have been fine both are wearing well, dry quickly and drain water fast. The Meindls are probably a bit lighter... The LOWA's seem more suited to rock and scree etc...

    That might be a suggestion but TBH neither drain as quickly as a true jungle boot.
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbitsmacker View Post
    jungle boots...the sole is designed for jungles, and ive found that its the sole that wears out first and have binned many a pair due to this. the americans found this when they deployed to gulf war 1 with the desert version...
    Actually the sole wasn't a problem in the 1st Gulf War. The boots from that era never lasted long enough for the soles to wear out; the stitching dry-rotted and the boots fell apart in the desert climate (just like most of our clothing)

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Here and there
    Posts
    395

    Default

    Thanks for that. I got the impression they were goretex sided from the pair I was looking at on ebay. Hmmm. i wonder if it was a genuine mistake or a bit of a porkie.
    I was actually thinking of getting them for use as hiking and wading boots (means I can take breathable, stocking foot waders in my backpack on an up and coming camping/fishing trip to Scotland, hike in the boots and then wear them in the water. It would mean I don't have to take two pairs of boots. I'd probably wear goretex socks while hiking, to keep my feet dry (hopefully). So in that respect, I suppose they'd be a good choice.
    I'm guessing if they're designed for the wet, there wouldn't be a problem with having them under water, a lot?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    No problems that I've ever noticed.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    your house!
    Posts
    10,938

    Default

    Ooof I personally would not recommend gtex socks for walking, I find they boil my feet so much so they would be dryer under water, I have worn gtex sock three times for trundles around 10 ish miles thinking it would be okay as it was warm last time i wore them and every time my feet have been horrid sweaty things, oly wear them with flip flops to go to the loo at night

  17. #17

    Default

    afarid its the same story everywhere, lowest bidder gets the contract, sad really when so much money is invested in the training and logistics, the weak links always include kit. anyway, how do you rate the boots?
    Quote Originally Posted by santaman2000 View Post
    Actually the sole wasn't a problem in the 1st Gulf War. The boots from that era never lasted long enough for the soles to wear out; the stitching dry-rotted and the boots fell apart in the desert climate (just like most of our clothing)
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbitsmacker View Post
    afarid its the same story everywhere, lowest bidder gets the contract, sad really when so much money is invested in the training and logistics, the weak links always include kit. anyway, how do you rate the boots?
    I liked them (other than the above mentioned problems in the Gulf War) very well. However I like the newer boots better. We went first from the jungle boots to Magnum High Techs and then to a Corcoran boot that was essentially the same thing with a military (paratroop) safe speed lacing eye. Since I've retired they've changed a few more times.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hamilton NZ
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbitsmacker View Post
    johnboy, those meindls look the mutts nuts, do you know what model they are?

    Yep they are Desert Foxes. But in Sage Green not Desert Tan... A really, really good boot especially if you ditch the crapola insoles as supplied and fit a pair of super feet.

    The sage green ones were sold here in NZ mainly aimed at the hunting fraternity. I havent seen any on sale for a while so they may have stopped doing them here...

    HTH
    Ka tū te ihiihi
    Ka tū te wanawana
    Ki runga ki te rangi e tū iho nei, tū iho nei, hī!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Essex UK
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Get a pair of these bad boys.



    I've got two pairs of Altbergs and they are marvellous! I've also got Lowa and in my opinion the Altbergs are better boots. And they're British. HOORAHH!!

  21. #21

    Default

    cheers johnboy, will give those a closer look when my current boots and i part company. if i picked up a pair of army desrt foxes, the type that are all over ebay, is that the same boot? or does the army one differ from a civvy one?
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hamilton NZ
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbitsmacker View Post
    cheers johnboy, will give those a closer look when my current boots and i part company. if i picked up a pair of army desrt foxes, the type that are all over ebay, is that the same boot? or does the army one differ from a civvy one?
    I don't think the Army one differs at all from the Civvy one.. In fact I'm not sure if they offered the Civvy one to many markets at all. The only difference between mine and the Issue ones on the bay is the colour.
    Ka tū te ihiihi
    Ka tū te wanawana
    Ki runga ki te rangi e tū iho nei, tū iho nei, hī!

  23. #23

    Default

    cheers for that. i've been tempted, but with funds as they are i've not gone for them, but if you rate them thats a good starter. certainly a good make. cheers again.
    Quote Originally Posted by johnboy View Post
    I don't think the Army one differs at all from the Civvy one.. In fact I'm not sure if they offered the Civvy one to many markets at all. The only difference between mine and the Issue ones on the bay is the colour.
    "a good reputation is hard won, and easily lost" - my nan

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    the Sundaland paleotropics & W. Australia
    Posts
    2,173

    Default

    The "canvas" or "goretex" on jungle boots is cordura, I believe. Feels like it.

    Eric Haney http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_L._Haney says in his book that he wore JBs during his SF/ Delta Force selection in the Uwharrie mountains for the advantages it gave him over those in regular boots

    Interestingly a friend told me just two days ago he does not trust his Altbergs to keep him on a log while crossing streams in the jungle.

    Hi Tec Magnums are great IMHO tho
    Last edited by BOD; 24-04-2012 at 07:11.
    "An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind" M. K. Gandhi

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BOD View Post
    The "canvas" or "goretex" on jungle boots is cordura, I believe. Feels like it...

    Hi Tec Magnums are great IMHO tho
    The original jungle boots (back in the 60s/early 70s) were canvas; after that they switched to ballistic nylon; Cordura is just one of the brand name for said BN (there are generic makers now also)

    I agree about High Techs.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushwhacker View Post
    Jungle boots are for the jungle.

    Thats crap. I wear my alt bergs for work and that can range from urban metro to dry bush to eucalypt/rainforest as a rural remote ambulance officer. I wear them as my feet dont sweat so much in the 35' heat of central queensland.

  27. #27

    Default

    I wore US military jungle boots for 20 years in the US Army. I have used the green canvas ones and the black nylon ones. They take some getting used to and they are pretty hard sole, no shock absorbtion. I still have the last ones I wore and some new ones I bought and I don't fit my old ones anymore and the new ones aren't fitting either. They are tough to get right!

    They are ok on most terrain and surfaces. Not at all waterproof and they have drain holes to let water out, which also lets it in. I wore them without socks in the jungle and with light military wool blend socks in normal conditions. I have jumped them on countless military jumps, never had any ankle problems, even with full load of gear.

    I would not recommend them as a hiking boot when there are so many other options that are so much more comfortable. The jungle boots are good in the jungle and tolerable for other conditions and if you are used to them, they are ok as daily footware. Hard to find the size that fits properly, they are never equal to my civilian shoe size.

    I hike mostly with some Asolo Echo Canyon hikers, they are a mid weight, good ankle support and work well with a heavy pack. I never once got a blister in the Asolos and I couldn't count all the blisters I had over the years in the jungle boots.

    So, unless you are planning a jungle trek, I would say get something besides jungle boots. Hope that helps.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wizard View Post
    I wore US military jungle boots for 20 years in the US Army. I have used the green canvas ones and the black nylon ones. They take some getting used to and they are pretty hard sole, no shock absorbtion...
    Depends on what you're used to. My "civilian" boots were (and are) cowboy boots. I've worked (humping paperwood blocks from 70 to 150 pounds all day), hunted, hiked and even swam in both and never had any trouble with either until I became diabetic. Now I sometimes have trouble with sneakers; but if my diabetes isn't bothering my feet then neither type boot gives me any trouble even now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •