Thanks for that Goose, very consise. I could have sworn that a new piece of legislation had been past last year but it doesn't seem to be the case. Very odd
.
Thanks for that Goose, very consise. I could have sworn that a new piece of legislation had been past last year but it doesn't seem to be the case. Very odd
.
May the devil rain pebble-stones on the tows of my enemies so I may know the buggers by there limp!
Hi WhichDoctor. During last year's Knife Amnesty there was a lot of media misinformation about all knives being illegal to carry, and this was trotted out by both senior police officers and politicians. May be this is what you were remembering, but as others here have said it is still legal to carry a sub-three inch slipjoint like a SAK without having to give a reason.
Regards,
Doug.
I am sorry and I don't mean to cause any offence but this sounds like tosh to me. " A good reason" is clear to everyone? The whole point of phrasing the law in such a way is to ensure that it is not clear. Otherwise the powers that be would have to cover every eventuality. Ultimately what is a good reason is only determined by the courts, but in practice it falls to the discretion of the officer who happens to have found the article on you.
I carry a non-locking knife under the size limit on me all the time and have not replaced my long lost L'man Wave precisely because the blade locks. But I would not assume that just because I have done nothing wrong that I don't have reason to be concerned.
Lets face it most lawbiding subjects who carry a pocket knife do so not because they have a good reason at any particular moment but because they forsee the possibility of such a moment arising when they will need one.
stephen
Originally Posted by Martyn
This might possibly be throwing petrol on the fire but it's important to remember that if you carry a non s.139 PCA (over 3 inches and/or non-folding blade) when giving your good reason for carrying it or lawful authority the burden of proof on yourself is to civil standards only. meaning you only have to prove that you had a good reason to carry it ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES whereas any officer trying to prove a s.139 compliant blade was an offensive weapon would have to prove your intent BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. This does not mean that you will not be arrested since the proving of that intent would be done either from situational inference or more likely, by interview, meaning that you can still be arrested to "allow the prompt and effective investigation of the offence"
To clarify, When i go camping i normally have to walk along a beech were the police are sometimes or walk about a mile on open pavment then another half on a bke path. I carry a 3 inch fold blade but when i get my mora and if im stopped when im in dpms and have my rucksack and say im away camping will that stick as a reason?
lol This reminds me of the recent coverage of the seventy year old man arrested for carrying an egg with intent. Did it get to court? Of course not, and it's been the object of public laughter and disdain since.
Lets face it, a pro boxer can be done with assault with a deadly weapon if they fight you, no doubt similar charges for martial artists. Don't do anything silly and remain calm in situations and a bit of foresight goes a long way too.
The police are all humans too, it's the few who give the whole a bad name. Most police would rather just giving a stern warning about being daft or stupid than make an arrest. Of course they also have all these lovely 'arrest quotas' to meet hence the egg man, above.
Last edited by Nagual; 08-06-2007 at 20:22. Reason: spelin
The whole of this thread can be boiled down to the simple advice of;
If you don't NEED it don't carry it.A sub 3" non locker will do for most domestic cutting jobs.
If you need a locker or a fixed blade,carry it.
DO NOT try to think up a reason that would allow you to carry just for the sake of it.![]()
What is the point?![]()
Mike
If a man is talking in the woods and there is no woman to hear him, is he still wrong?
Mods, just a thought but maybe it's time this thread got put to bed? As a whole new series of members find and read it, there will likely be a whole new series of rants etc...
"I feel I was denied critical need-to-know information!"
~ Burt Gummer
Agreed Martyn. It is unweildy as it is, any longer and even if (big IF) anything new and useful is posted, it will be hard for anyone to find it again.
Chris
Being lost is a state of mind, not a state of place.