PDA

View Full Version : Loads on hammocks



oetzi
24-08-2007, 17:04
I got interested in Hammocks for using them in the woods next winter. Makes a bit of a difference from selling them to customers who wouldnt dream of doing so.
So I thought I post some informations I gathered years ago to make live easier in the shop when Hammocks are concerned.
My customers always think, when setting one up, that they can get away with the thinnest, cheapest, most fragile rope lying around. Not realising that this might be a bit dangerous, because the load on each end of a Hammock can far exceed the weight of the user.
This is the case when the Hammock is not set up in the traditional curved way but stretched tight to achieve a flat position for the user.
Digging a bit into long lost knowledge from school, I came up with this (, no scanner):

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a273/Supercorsa/Bushcraft/Image00002-1.jpg

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a273/Supercorsa/Bushcraft/Image00001-1.jpg

Usually, its not possible to pitch a hammock and use it completely flat. The material will always sag a bit, so the angle will be greater than 10°.
But, as can be seen from the pics, the loads depend on this pitching-angle and may vary a bit from the users weight. Also one has to take into account, that a simple knot or a tight radius will reduce the loadbearing quality of any rope by 30-50%.
For me, after 21 years working retail, there has also to be considered what I call the "DF-quotient", meaning how much of a dumb F**k the customer might be. Sounds harsh, but if something fails I am the one to be blamed, so I like to err on the cautious side.
An example:
Mayself and some equipment amount to ca 100kg. So the load on each rope can be easily 200kg.
A standard static rope (called "Reepschnur") with a diameter of 5mm holds a STATIC!!!!!! load of ca 5,8kN.
So for myself I would be on the safe side with this and if I were a weightweenie would even consider 4mm with 4,1KN.
The customers get a recommendation of 6mm (9,7KN) or better 7-8mm (12,8-14,8KN).
Long term use/abuse and substandard setup have to be considered and who knows how many children might try to climb into the Hammock and jump around etc?
The good thing on the pics above is, that everyone can do as he likes, but with solid neutral information as a Base.

Mastino
27-08-2007, 08:10
Nice math! But what if the load is stretched over, let's say, 180 cm instead of being all placed in the center? The model implies someone hanging right in de middle...

Nevertheless good information in order to preven something nasty to happen with the lower end of the spine.

swyn
27-08-2007, 08:37
Thanks for that useful info oetzi.

Swyn.

Porcupine
27-08-2007, 17:46
now if only i could read all that he writes.....

Ogri the trog
27-08-2007, 20:01
It's worth also remembering the potential damage that thin ropes can do to the bark of a tree. Wide tape is much more sympathetic to the bark and kinder to the tree in general. I use 2" wide polypropelene (IIRC), and you can hardly see where it has been once you remove it after use, that and it takes my 120kg weight without me having to worry!

ATB

Ogri the trog

bloodline
27-08-2007, 21:41
Absolutly astouding thread, I really must print a copy of it for my next trip into the outdoors God knows how I survived (in my hammock) this weekend without it.

Aaron
27-08-2007, 21:49
Professor Einstein Lives! (and is selling hammocks):lmao:

commandocal
27-08-2007, 23:22
I dont understand lol :) I think i kind of get it though O_o

oetzi
31-08-2007, 16:44
It's worth also remembering the potential damage that thin ropes can do to the bark of a tree. Wide tape is much more sympathetic to the bark and kinder to the tree in general. I use 2" wide polypropelene (IIRC), and you can hardly see where it has been once you remove it after use, that and it takes my 120kg weight without me having to worry!

ATB

Ogri the trog

Actually, I phoned our supplier of this kind of webbing (Polyester, 20mm and 25mm).
the 20mm takes loads up to 5KN, the 25mm up to 7KN.

Porcupine
31-08-2007, 20:26
ok, im kinda confused and all.

do i understand corectly that 20 mm webbing is less strong then a 5mm cord?

IF thats correct did i also understand i should look for 30mm webbing or broader to be safe?


im getting kinda curious cause i weigh 100 kilos and thought i was on the safe side in my choice of materials lol

oetzi
02-09-2007, 18:13
Yes, the webbing I refer to has taken tests, with Data sheets etc, of a minimum of 5KN.
Of course, there can be some variations according to manufacturers.
The same goes for ropes! Mammut for example makes static ropes which are, in 6 and 7mm diameter, inferior to Edelrid.
If your Hammock were pitched up with a REAL 10°, this would mean about 300Kg on each leg. A bit more than 50% of the load bearing capacity of 20mm webbing.
But the angle is rarely that shallow, why dont you check (maybe on older pics) the angle you use normally, for peace of mind?

oetzi
02-09-2007, 18:15
Nice math! But what if the load is stretched over, let's say, 180 cm instead of being all placed in the center? The model implies someone hanging right in de middle...


its all the same for the ropes!